This is the mail archive of the archer@sourceware.org mailing list for the Archer project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: archer-swagiaal-using-directive patch on static variables inmethods

From: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: archer at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:11:18 -0500
Subject: Re: archer-swagiaal-using-directive patch on static variables inmethods
References: <20081124002822.GA9859@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <492C6060.60107@redhat.com> <20081126142322.GA29416@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <492DB4FB.8000303@redhat.com> <20081129001102.GA5006@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <49358357.8040005@redhat.com> <20081219191312.GA30616@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

Jan Kratochvil wrote:

Hi Sami,

with http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38390 already fixed by Dodji is gcc-4.4 now already right regarding DW_AT_abstract_origin?
I see in your commit 899553354dee906edce78e198c02aefb9b422913 you still
workaround DW_AT_specification but I hope it is currently needed only for
g++-4.3.

I did not check 4.4, regarding the DW_AT_specification issue but yes the workaround is for 4.3, as the Eric demo will probably be done using 4.3.

Sami

References:
- archer-swagiaal-using-directive patch on static variables inmethods
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: archer-swagiaal-using-directive patch on static variables inmethods
  - From: Sami Wagiaalla
- Re: archer-swagiaal-using-directive patch on static variables inmethods
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]