Re: Fedora 14 debug proposal

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:31:44PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Dodji> I guess at worst, upstream will require a flag to get the
> Dodji> .debug_{pug,aranges,pubnames,pubtypes} section back for a little
> Dodji> while before removing the code completely?
> 
> Tom> I wouldn't bother with an option, but then I'm not very concerned about
> Tom> whether this particular change goes upstream.  Of course, that is easy
> Tom> for me to say -- I will do whatever Jakub thinks is best here.
> 
> On irc, Jakub asked for this to be sent upstream, just to see if they
> would accept it.  I'm struggling through a regtest, you'll see it on
> gcc-patches "soon".

I guess everybody is struggling with bootstraps/regtests lately,
apparently every second patch or so from Honza lately causes a bootstrap failure
or some regression, really wonder what kind of testing he does on his
patches if any.

	Jakub