Re: gdb index performance

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> Ugh, I looked at the x86 case and it turns out I need a merge from
Tom> master to pick up some unhandled DWARF operators.  Sorry about that.

New x86 results.

attach:

+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|       gdb|      cold| cache gdb|      warm|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    system|     44.91|     41.68|      2.90|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    master|     71.06|     66.57|     13.08|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    branch|     41.51|     38.07|      4.54|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+

thread apply all bt full:

+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|       gdb|      cold| cache gdb|      warm|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    system|    116.16|    110.43|     16.46|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    master|     74.65|     70.57|     14.75|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|    branch|     49.65|     46.55|      5.62|
+----------+----------+----------+----------+

Tom