This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: implib -- pe-dll vs binutils discrepancies

To: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Subject: Re: implib -- pe-dll vs binutils discrepancies
From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:22:54 -0500
Cc: khan at NanoTech dot Wisc dot EDU, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1000105161338.25037E-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu> <200001052229.RAA22994@envy.delorie.com>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 05:29:57PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> 1. The hint table should have xlate'd name a far as I know. It is so in
>>    dlltool (dlltool.c:make_one_lib_file()), but not so in pe-dll
>>    (pe-dll.c:make_one()). Which one is correct?
>
>ld and dlltool do the same thing different ways, but dlltool does
>supply additional features.  Both are correct.  dlltool is just more
>functional in a few (hopefully) less-common usages.

Does that mean that ld doesn't produce a hint table?  Or is this something
used in the stub?

cgf

References:
- implib -- pe-dll vs binutils discrepancies
  - From: Mumit Khan
- Re: implib -- pe-dll vs binutils discrepancies
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]