This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: libiberty/partition.c
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at zembu dot com>
- Subject: Re: libiberty/partition.c
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 19:52:32 -0700
- cc: echristo at cygnus dot com, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, samuel at codesourcery dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <20000325013507.4371.qmail@daffy.airs.com>you write:
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:30:58 -0800
> From: Eric Christopher <echristo@cygnus.com>
>
> Doesn't appear to exist in the tree. Looks like this change:
>
> 2000-03-09 Alex Samuel <samuel@codesourcery.com>
>
> * Makefile.in (CFILES): Add partition.c.
> (REQUIRED_OFILES): Add partition.o.
> (partition.o): New rule.
> * partition.c: New file.
>
> Didn't make it in - though it made it into egcs. Wonky.
>
> The binutils/gdb repository and the egcs repository are separate.
> Checking something into egcs does not imply checking it into
> binutils. However, if something is approved for checkin to the egcs
> version of libiberty, please feel free to bring it over to the
> binutils version of libiberty.
I've been wondering how well CVS would work if there was a symlink for the
libiberty & include directories until we can merge the sourceware & gcc
repos. I haven't done any experiments, though I'm rather leery given the
problems the FSF had with symlinks in the CVS tree.
jeff