This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 21 Jul 2000 23:15:06 -0300
- Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>, hjl at lucon dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200007220041.RAA21782@wilson.cygnus.com><u9r98nuge8.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com>
On Jul 21, 2000, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com> writes:
>> On the other hand, if we do have the -B/-L/-I options, then we don't
>> need the stuff in the stmp-fixinc rule anymore, and you don't have to
>> worry about ordering problems, so that may make the Makefile
>> dependencies simpler.
> I think that would be my preference; creating stuff in $(prefix) as
> part of the build seems pretty ugly to me.
Agreed. But it may (re-)open a can of worms for all other projects
built in the same build tree.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me