This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:18:19 +1000
CC: Nick Clifton <nickc at cygnus dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <200007201926.MAA01613@elmo.cygnus.com> <20000720124049.A6742@lucon.org>

"H . J . Lu" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:26:57PM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > : Well, it is kind of misleading since glibc 2.1 does support dynamic
> > : tags. It just doesn't support the unknown tags in certain range.
> > :
> > : --enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > : --no-enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > :
> > : is better.
> >
> > That is OK with me.
> 
> How about just
> 
> --disable-new-dynamic-tags
> --enable-new-dynamic-tags

Um, do you really want to call something ``new''.  Similar to the
comment I just posted to GCC-patches, it will be old soon enough.

	Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]