This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860
- To: Jason Eckhardt <jle at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:35:10 +0200
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000730143408.4267A@cse.cygnus.com>
Jason Eckhardt <jle@cygnus.com> writes:
|> These are new BFD_RELOC_*'s for i860.
|>
|> Are bfd-in2.h and libbfd.h the only regens I need to do for a change to
|> reloc.c?
|>
|> 2000-07-30 Jason Eckhardt <jle@cygnus.com>
|>
|> * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860.
|> * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate.
|>
|>
|> Index: bfd/reloc.c
|> ===================================================================
|> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
|> retrieving revision 1.27
|> diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 reloc.c
|> *** reloc.c 2000/07/20 16:21:07 1.27
|> --- reloc.c 2000/07/30 21:32:21
|> *************** ENUMDOC
|> *** 2912,2917 ****
|> --- 2912,2988 ----
|> These relocs are only used within the CRIS assembler. They are not
|> (at present) written to any object files.
|>
|> + ENUM
|> + BFD_RELOC_860_NONE
|> + ENUMX
|> + BFD_RELOC_860_32
In which way are these different from BFD_RELOC_NONE and BFD_RELOC_32,
resp.?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg