Re: Patch: Only use strict COFF for djgpp

["H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 05:07:45PM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> 
>     * We need some way to ensure that the cofftag gas tests will pass
>       when STRICTCOFF is defined.  We could just eliminate the test in
>       the gas.exp script, (since lots of other ports do), but I feel
>       that this is wrong.  I would suggest editing the cofftag.d file
>       to allow -1 or -2 for the section numbers for entries 6, 7 and
>       8.
> 

Here is the patch for cofftag.


H.J.
---
2000-08-21  H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>

	* gas/all/cofftag.d: Support the strict COFF.

Index: gas/all/cofftag.d
===================================================================
RCS file: /work/cvs/gnu/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/all/cofftag.d,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 cofftag.d
--- gas/all/cofftag.d	1999/06/03 18:02:02	1.1.1.1
+++ gas/all/cofftag.d	2000/08/22 06:43:19
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ File 
 \[  3\]\(sec  1\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   0\)\(scl   6\) \(nx 0\) 0x0+0000 ___gnu_compiled_c
 \[  4\]\(sec -2\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   a\)\(scl  15\) \(nx 1\) 0x0+0000 _token
 AUX lnno 0 size 0x4 tagndx 0 endndx 10
-\[  6\]\(sec -1\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   b\)\(scl  16\) \(nx 0\) 0x0+0000 _operator
-\[  7\]\(sec -1\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   b\)\(scl  16\) \(nx 0\) 0x0+0001 _flags
-\[  8\]\(sec -1\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   0\)\(scl 102\) \(nx 1\) 0x0+0004 .eos
+\[  6\]\(sec -(1|2)\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   b\)\(scl  16\) \(nx 0\) 0x0+0000 _operator
+\[  7\]\(sec -(1|2)\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   b\)\(scl  16\) \(nx 0\) 0x0+0001 _flags
+\[  8\]\(sec -(1|2)\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   0\)\(scl 102\) \(nx 1\) 0x0+0004 .eos
 AUX lnno 0 size 0x4 tagndx 4
 \[ 10\]\(sec  1\)\(fl 0x00\)\(ty   0\)\(scl   3\) \(nx 1\) 0x[0-9a-f]+ .text
 AUX scnlen 0x[0-9a-f]+ nreloc 0 nlnno 0