This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

BFD Patch to cpu-powerpc.c


I Posted the following patch on the 31st of August, and have had no
response.

Has it: 
a) been accepted?
b) been rejected?
c) fallen on deaf ears?
d) fallen through the cracks?
e) none of the above.

If there is nothing wrong with it, how long should I wait before I ask
again how things are going?

Steven.

<--------- ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW --------------->

I Have added MPC860 Family processor to cpu-powerpc.c there was already
a
bfd entry so this was probably an oversight. Ive tested it with GDB, and
it
works.

Im not subscribed to this list, so please CC any replies directly to me:
sbjohnson@ozemail.com.au

Steven Johnson

Changelog for bfd:

2000-08-31  Steven Johnson  <sbjohnson@ozemail.com.au>
       
        * cpu-powerpc.c - Added MPC860 Family entry to
arch_info_struct[]
          
<<<----- PATCH STARTS HERE ----->>>

diff -C2 -r -b ../gdb_cvs/src/bfd/cpu-powerpc.c src/bfd/cpu-powerpc.c
*** ../gdb_cvs/src/bfd/cpu-powerpc.c    Thu Jul  6 11:53:14 2000
--- src/bfd/cpu-powerpc.c       Thu Aug 31 13:44:10 2000
***************
*** 202,205 ****
--- 202,219 ----
      powerpc_compatible,
      bfd_default_scan,
+     &arch_info_struct[11]
+   },
+   {
+     32,       /* 32 bits in a word */
+     32,       /* 32 bits in an address */
+     8,        /* 8 bits in a byte */
+     bfd_arch_powerpc,
+     bfd_mach_ppc_860,
+     "powerpc",
+     "powerpc:MPC8XX",
+     3,
+     false, /* not the default */
+     powerpc_compatible,
+     bfd_default_scan,
      0
    }

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]