This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] PIC support for SH


  In message <orn1hcassa.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>you write:
  > --=-=-=
  > 
  > On Sep  8, 2000, NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@chroot.org> wrote:
  > 
  > > Alexandre Oliva wrote:
  > >> It is my understanding that Hitachi had told us to use this range.
  > >> But I may be mistaken.
  > 
  > > Strange.  Hitachi assigned 160-167 for that, here in Japan.  Perhaps,
  > > there would be some dis-communication.  We'll check it again too.
  > 
  > There was indeed some misunderstanding.  We should have used the range
  > 160-167 too.  Here's a patch that fixes this problem.  Ok to install?
  > 
  > 
  > --=-=-=
  > Content-Type: text/x-patch
  > Content-Disposition: inline; filename=shpic-include.patch
  > 
  > Index: include/elf/ChangeLog
  > from  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
  > 
  > 	* sh.h (R_SH_GOT32, R_SH_PLT32, R_SH_COPY, R_SH_GLOB_DAT,
  > 	R_SH_JMP_SLOT, R_SH_RELATIVE, R_SH_GOTOFF, R_SH_GOTPC): Change
  > 	numbers to the range from 160 to 167.
  > 	(R_SH_FIRST_INVALID_RELOC): Adjust.
  > 	(R_SH_FIRST_INVALID_RELOC_2, R_SH_LAST_INVALID_RELOC_2):
  > 	New relocs to fill in the gap.
Approved.
jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]