This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Handle java_demangling?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:11:32PM -0500, Kenneth Block wrote:
> Yes.
>
Any objections to check in this patch?
H.J.
---
> -----Original Message-----
> From: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of H . J . Lu
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:45 PM
> To: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Cc: kenneth.block@compaq.com
> Subject: Handle java_demangling?
>
> Shouldn't java_demangling be handled since we support it now?
>
>
> --
> H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)
> ---
> 2000-11-16 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
>
> * cplus-dem.c (main): Handle java_demangling.
>
> --- cplus-dem.c Thu Nov 16 11:32:15 2000
> +++ cplus-dem.c Thu Nov 16 12:41:21 2000
> @@ -5092,6 +5092,7 @@ main (argc, argv)
> case gnu_demangling:
> case lucid_demangling:
> case arm_demangling:
> + case java_demangling:
> case edg_demangling:
> valid_symbols = standard_symbol_characters ();
> break;
>
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)