This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility

To: David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
Subject: Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:58:35 -0800
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20001111234523.A28829@valinux.com> <20001125035332.C58975@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001125104006.B20779@valinux.com> <20001125125206.B96106@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001125130018.B25616@valinux.com> <20001125131550.F96106@dragon.nuxi.com>

On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 01:15:50PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > As I undersand, static binaries are almost not supported under Solaris
> > 2.7 and above.
> 
> 64-bit Solaris only.  They did not remove the ability to create them in
> 32-bit code.
>  

Can you build static binaries using NSS functions under Solaris 2?

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)

References:
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]