This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Old PLT in elf64-alpha via ld --traditional-format?

To: Todd Vierling <tv at wasabisystems dot com>
Subject: Re: Old PLT in elf64-alpha via ld --traditional-format?
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:49:44 -0800
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20010209101505.A7943@redhat.com> <Pine.WNT.4.32.0102091344220.-90187-100000@xpc.int.duh.org>

On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:46:03PM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:
> Not yet.  But please reread the "make newer binutils still work....".

I did read that.  Thus my comment about an errata ld.so.

I think you're going through a lot of effort to fix a bug
in the wrong place.  If a user is going to upgrade binutils
on an old system, they can upgrade ld.so at the same time.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old PLT in elf64-alpha via ld --traditional-format?
  - From: Jason R Thorpe

References:
- Re: Old PLT in elf64-alpha via ld --traditional-format?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Old PLT in elf64-alpha via ld --traditional-format?
  - From: Todd Vierling

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]