This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PDP-11 port
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: PDP-11 port
- From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars dot spam at nocrew dot org>
- Date: 19 Feb 2001 09:18:02 +0100
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: nocrew
- References: <200102182333.PAA25340@elmo.cygnus.com>
Thanks for checking in my patches and taking the time to make the
corrections.
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes:
> One other thing that you missed, which I did not fix, was the lack of
> a GAS testsuite to check the assembler and disassembler to make sure
> that they work. I hope that you will find some time to take care of
> this.
Sure, I'll have a look at it.
After the merger, there were two differences between my tree and the
CVS tree. The first is just a spelling correction, but the second may
be more important.
Index: bfd/bfd-in2.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in2.h,v
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.87 bfd-in2.h
--- bfd-in2.h 2001/02/18 23:32:53 1.87
+++ bfd-in2.h 2001/02/19 08:10:16
@@ -2089,7 +2089,7 @@
BFD_RELOC_NS32K_DISP_16_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_NS32K_DISP_32_PCREL,
-/* PDP11 relocations */
+/* PDP-11 relocations */
BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_8_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_6_PCREL,
Index: bfd/reloc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.36 reloc.c
--- reloc.c 2001/02/18 23:32:57 1.36
+++ reloc.c 2001/02/19 08:10:18
@@ -2130,6 +2130,13 @@
Picojava relocs. Not all of these appear in object files.
ENUM
+ BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_8_PCREL
+ENUMX
+ BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_6_PCREL
+ENUMDOC
+ PDP-11 relocations
+
+ENUM
BFD_RELOC_PPC_B26
ENUMX
BFD_RELOC_PPC_BA26