This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PDP-11 port
- To: Lars Brinkhoff <lars dot spam at nocrew dot org>
- Subject: Re: PDP-11 port
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Date: 19 Feb 2001 10:36:51 -0800
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Hi Lars,
> After the merger, there were two differences between my tree and the
> CVS tree. The first is just a spelling correction, but the second may
> be more important.
>
> Index: bfd/bfd-in2.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in2.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.87
> diff -u -r1.87 bfd-in2.h
> --- bfd-in2.h 2001/02/18 23:32:53 1.87
> +++ bfd-in2.h 2001/02/19 08:10:16
> @@ -2089,7 +2089,7 @@
> BFD_RELOC_NS32K_DISP_16_PCREL,
> BFD_RELOC_NS32K_DISP_32_PCREL,
>
> -/* PDP11 relocations */
> +/* PDP-11 relocations */
> BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_8_PCREL,
> BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_6_PCREL,
Yup, typo on my part - sorry. It should go away the next time I
regenerate this file.
> Index: bfd/reloc.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
> diff -u -r1.36 reloc.c
> --- reloc.c 2001/02/18 23:32:57 1.36
> +++ reloc.c 2001/02/19 08:10:18
> @@ -2130,6 +2130,13 @@
> Picojava relocs. Not all of these appear in object files.
>
> ENUM
> + BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_8_PCREL
> +ENUMX
> + BFD_RELOC_PDP11_DISP_6_PCREL
> +ENUMDOC
> + PDP-11 relocations
> +
> +ENUM
> BFD_RELOC_PPC_B26
> ENUMX
> BFD_RELOC_PPC_BA26
What is wrong with this ?
Cheers
Nick