This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Test results for first test release for 2.11


>h8500-coff, tic80-coff, and we32k-coff all did work at one time.  I'm
>not sure about pj (PicoJava) or vax-dec-ultrix.

tic80 is rejected out of hand by the current config.sub.  It was added to the 
copy in the binutils tree in 1996, but presumably lost in some subsequent 
import of that file from the FSF sources.  I'll put it back.

The problem with h8500-coff and pj-elf is that config.bfd wants a three-part 
target name (pj-unknown-elf, say) but config.sub is insisting on only two 
parts.  Again, this looks like it worked when originally added to the local 
copy of config.sub but was broken shortly thereafter.

FWIW, this is the list of machines for which the current config.sub wants a 
two-part name:

	m88110 | m680[12346]0 | m683?2 | m68360 | m5200 | z8k | v70 | h8500 | w65 | pj | pjl)

Does anybody know what the reason for this is?

p.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]