This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: config.if for glibc 2.2

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>
Subject: Re: PATCH: config.if for glibc 2.2
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:23:23 -0700
Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>,binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010516100428.A3140@lucon.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010516194641.12970F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:38:22PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
> 
> > Wrong. Which compiler are you using to do such a test when you build a
> > cross compiler? The right compiler to use is the cross compiler you
> 
>  The one that is going to be used to build libstdc++.  At the point
> config.if gets evaluated the compiler is already available and the CC
> variable is set appropriately.

In that case, you shouldn't use $(CC-cc) since cc will be definitely
wrong for cross compile.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: config.if for glibc 2.2
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

References:
- Re: PATCH: config.if for glibc 2.2
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH: config.if for glibc 2.2
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]