This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: DT_NEEDED
- To: Bharadwaj Yadavalli <bharadwaj dot yadavalli at compaq dot com>
- Subject: Re: DT_NEEDED
- From: amodra at one dot net dot au
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:43:29 +0930
- Cc: hjl at gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200105181454.KAA22587@ives.lkg.dec.com>
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:54:49AM -0400, Bharadwaj Yadavalli wrote:
>
> Although a couple of possibile "solutions" come to mind, I am
> wondering if this is even a problem and if I am missing something
> obvious to achieve what I want - i.e., choose which file's full path
> name should be in the dependency list and which shouldn't _in case
> the input SO's do not have a DT_SONAME entry._
In the absence of sonames, you should be able to record arbitrary
dt_needed entries by using symbolic links. ie. mimic the install
directory structure in the build directory. I guess creative use
of -L will allow the same result.