This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Binutuls is broken now.
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- Subject: Re: Binutuls is broken now.
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:22:16 -0700
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010618181032.A3130@lucon.org> <200106190113.DAA14322@ignucius.axis.se>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:13:18AM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:10:32 -0700
> > From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 05:59:48PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > It's fine to allow binary input files for ld -r in all cases. In
> > > general it's fine to allow any input file which has no relocations for
> > > ld -r.
> >
> > Given what we know, if my patch is not acceptable to everyone, may I
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > suggest we revert the patch:
> >
> > 2001-06-15 Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> >
> > * ldlang.c (lang_check): Emit fatal error if relocatable link
> > between different object flavours.
> >
> > We can find some better ways to deal with it later.
>
> I disagree. That would *again* SEGV as I described when the
> patch was submitted. I think your follow-up-patch would be much
> better.
Please re-read my email. I wanted to check it in under the obvious
fix rule. But you were against it. Please state clearly how you
want to fix the problem. I really don't care how you fix it as long
as the binary input is allowed again.
H.J.