This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- To: David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Subject: Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:37:53 -0700
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>,binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <20010616093504.B2742@lucon.org> <m3ae371mas.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20010617120315.A2587@lucon.org> <20010625111426.A99064@dragon.nuxi.com>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:14:26AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:03:16PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > # make binutils.tar.bz2 -f Makefile.in
> >
> > All the man pages are generated along with the info pages and included
> > in the tarball.
>
> The resulting manpages have a nit in them:
>
> OBJCOPY.1(1) GNU OBJCOPY.1(1)
>
That is easy to fix. We just need to replace all those $@.pod with
xxx.pod, like ar.pod, ... etc, in binutils/doc/Makefile.am. Can you
submit a patch to do that?
Thanks.
H.J.