This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Changes To Fixup Saving, Restoring and Swapping


I don't have any particular use for it myself at this point.  The idea was
just that I didn't see the necessity of wiping out the local/saved copy of
fixups that have just been saved/restored so I chose to give the user a
choice.  I can remove it if you like.  Just out of curiosity though, why
don't you want it in there?  Do you see it possibly allowing something
detrimental to happen?

John

"Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote:

> Hi -
>
> jhealy wrote:
> : A port I'm working on requires packing a set of instructions (two at
> : this point, more later) into a vliw word.   In order to be able to
> : handle more than two instructions at a time during assembly, an
> : enhancement to the gas_cgen_[save/restore/swap]_fixups mechanism is
> : required. [...]
>
> All okay, except for:
>
> : [...]  Just in case it might be of
> : use, I've also added a little extra feature that allows for the current
> : fixups to be either kept or cleared when stored and for a set of stored
> : fixups to be either kept or cleared when restored.
>
> I would prefer not to have this extension in the code, unless your current
> internal port has use for it, or unless you can make a more persuasive
> argument for it than "just in case".
>
> : I threw some documentation in too. [and tested on m32r]
>
> Thanks!
>
> - FChE
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]