This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: traditional mips vs. little endian?
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: traditional mips vs. little endian?
- From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
- Date: 31 Jul 2001 08:50:14 +0100
- Cc: cgd at sibyte dot com, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <yov5vgkk234z.fsf@highland.sibyte.com><20010722122158.A30063@lucon.org> <yov5n15wvi35.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <20010722192915.A18268@lucon.org>
> I believe only IRIX should use the SGI ABI and the rest should use
> the SVR4 ABI. But it is not my call. I have no problems to limit
> the SVR4 ABI to Linux in the binutils testcases.
>
I'd agree with this, and I think cgd would as well. It'd at least add
some uniformity and deal with the big/little endian issue as well.
-eric
--
Look out behind you!