This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Fix for s390_elf_cons.
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: Fix for s390_elf_cons.
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 22:29:20 +0930
- Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>, binutils at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <OF51DE34DF.8B6159E0-ONC1256A98.0077728B@de.ibm.com> <hoae1ccd2r.fsf@gee.suse.de>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:41:00PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > Andreas complained that binutils-2.11.90.0.24 doesn't work on s390/s390x.
> > Well he is right. The problem is that the behaviour of fixup_segment has
> > changed a bit. The solution is to pass false for pcrel on the call to
> > fix_new_exp in s390_elf_cons. Then the missing pc relative conversion in
> > fixup_segment are done again.
>
> Has this issue now been resolved? I didn't see the patch committed
> and from the discussion it's not clear to me what should be done now.
Since I was involved in the discussion, let me make it clear that I don't
have an objection to the patch itself. It's OK to commit in that it does
the right thing interpreting the, to my mind weird, s390 assembly syntax.
I suppose it's too late to change the syntax now.
Alan