This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.

To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.
From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:03:40 +0930
Cc: Kazu Hirata <kazu at hxi dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
References: <200108171934.MAA23915@cygnus.com> <3B7DF02F.90201@cygnus.com> <20010818145846.E31523@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3B7EA0FF.6010601@cygnus.com>

On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Ah, we've got a pan-pacific manual throwing competition on our hands :-)

:-)

> A brace sharing a line with other junk doesn't exactly look GNU :-)

Yes, I agree.  I personally prefer to put the opening brace of a struct
or enum definition in the first column.  c++ class, namespace opening
braces look right in the first column too.

Your correction to Kazu however, does run foul of the very first rule
regarding formatting in the GNU coding standard, and we're trying to
make binutils comply with the standard.  bug-standards@gnu.org?

Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [patch] *-dis.c: Fix formatting.
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]