This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
From: Earl Chew <earl_chew at agilent dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:48:57 -0700
Cc: ian at airs dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Organization: Agilent Technologies
References: <3BD50B99.4B658EB9@agilent.com> <20011022232702.A3893@lucon.org> <20011023110449.A15924@lucon.org> <3BD6023D.DBC2FD3A@agilent.com> <20011023172714.A21868@lucon.org>

"H . J . Lu" wrote:
> Earl Chew wrote:
> >
> > Did you consider my patch?
> >
> > Does it solve the underlying problem, or just paper over the bug?
> 
> I don't know.

[ snip ]
 
> > If you look at the equivalent code in binutils-2.7 (which
> > doesn't have the bug), I think you'll find that the count was
> > held exclusively in o->reloc_count. Remnants of that code remain
> > as the first loop in elf_bfd_final_link() which updates o->reloc_count.
> >
> 
> I am not sure if we should even update o->reloc_count there.

How do you suggest we resolve this issue?

Earl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: Eric M. Christopher

References:
- MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: Earl Chew
- Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: Earl Chew
- Re: MIPS ELF ld -Ur fails
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]