This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Release 2.12

To: David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
Subject: Re: Release 2.12
From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:00:41 +0930
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0110242110130.52184-100000@dair.pair.com> <20011025110841.Z1037@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20011024184341.B17802@dragon.nuxi.com>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:43:41PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> There seems to be consensus that 2.12.0 is needed.
> Once H.J. says 'yes' to HP's email, is this a good time to create the
> 2_12 branch? :-))

May I remind you that the binutils project isn't run as a democracy?  :-)

Addressing the technical side of this question, I'd say that we need
a freeze on new features to let the tree stabilise before branching.
eg. some of my recent commits broke various things, and I've had reports
that ppc embedded targets are broken due to mrg's recent commit.

Alan

Follow-Ups:
- MMIX (was: Re: Release 2.12)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Release 2.12
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]