This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libbfd documentation date is too old

To: obrien at NUXI dot com
Subject: Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:40:46 -0400
Cc: nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20011023123059.A76479@dragon.nuxi.com> <m3u1wmsioq.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20011026102254.A12435@dragon.nuxi.com> <siadye44j6.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20011026115938.B11230@dragon.nuxi.com>

> 
> Should we remove it?  I have seen it confuse people that productize
> Binutils.

Productize?  Someone put this person out of their misery!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: David O'Brien

References:
- libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: libbfd documentation date is too old
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]