This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: sh-linux is now broken


Conclusion: Those are not regressions by my change.  Those tests
depend on GCC.  I'm using (modified) GCC 3.0.2.
 
NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
 > Yes, sure.  I've fix some of them.  I'm currently investigating following
 > four cases remained:
 > 
 >  > -------- Unexpected failures were:
 >  > Running /home/gniibe/gniibe/c/src/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp ...
 >  > FAIL: selective4
 >  > FAIL: selective5

This test depends on C++.  I'll check Linux/x86 case, and if it will
emit same symbols, I'll change the test cases as expected failure.

 >  > -------- Unexpected successes were:
 >  > Running /home/gniibe/gniibe/c/src/ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp ...
 >  > XPASS: undefined function
 >  > XPASS: undefined line

It correctry emit function and the line number.  I don't know the
reason why it's not expected to pass.  I'll check another architecture
which uses DWARF2.  Possibly, I'll change the test case as expected to
pass.

Later, 
-- 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]