This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
- Subject: Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:57:15 -0500
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <20011113135246.A71808@dragon.nuxi.com>
[Get raw message]
> I know this is going to be controveral... But could non libiberty
> includes be moved from include to bu-include? The reason being is that
> at the moment it is hard to build a Cygnus-like cross build tree from the
> Binutils, gdb, and GCC sources. The only conflicting directory is
> include, and since the GCC version of libiberty are the "golden" bits,
> I'd prefer to use those.
The bits that are common between the gcc and binutils repositories are
in sync and are kept in sync by a semi-automatic script. Just use
whatever is in the binutils repository and you should be fine. I
build that every night.