This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:59:52 +1030
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
References: <20011116202027.K527@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011119190655.A6922@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20011119135131.D543@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011120093041.D6922@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20011122114741.I611@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:47:41AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Here is the full reloc -> STT_SECTION sym in SHF_MERGE section patch.
> Bootstrapped with --enable-targets=all --enable-64-bit-bfd, no regressions
> on i386-redhat-linux, visually tested some programs using SHF_MERGE on i386
> and sparc.
> Ok to commit?

Looks OK to me.

> +/* For RELA architectures, return what the relocation value for
> +   relocation against local symbol.  */

"return the relocation value for a relocation against a local symbol"

Alan

References:
- RFC: Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: RFC: Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: RFC: Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: RFC: Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
  - From: Alan Modra
- [PATCH] Allow STT_SECTION + offset for SHF_MERGE sections
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]