This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unaligned R_SPARC_RELATIVEs

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, mrauch at netbsd dot org
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:19:56 +0100
Subject: Re: unaligned R_SPARC_RELATIVEs
References: <200112052131.fB5LVmD18181@greed.delorie.com> <200112070055.fB70t9u10807@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:55:09PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > I'm seeing R_SPARC_RELATIVEs with the LSB still set.  If someone knows
> > a fix off the top of your head (Jakub?), please shout, else I'll debug
> > it myself when it bubbles back to the top of my todo list.
> 
> Tracked it down to this:
> 
> 2001-09-14  Michael Rauch <mrauch@netbsd.org>
> 
> 	* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section): Treat R_SPARC_UA32
> 	just like R_SPARC_32.

That change is bogus, only aligned R_SPARC_32 relocs can be converted into
R_SPARC_RELATIVE.  Reverted.
Thanks for catching this.

	Jakub

References:
- unaligned R_SPARC_RELATIVEs
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: unaligned R_SPARC_RELATIVEs
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]