This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd is broken

From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: hjl at lucon dot org
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:54:51 -0800
Subject: Re: bfd is broken
References: <20020110182730.A12778@lucon.org>
Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>


The configuration I used to test the original patch was x86 Red Hat
Linux 7 with all updates applied, using the Red Hat GNUPro 00r1
compiler, without special configure flags; and the bootstrap test
passed.  When I got your message I ran a build with the toplevel
binutils CVS tree, the latest bundled compiler gcc-2.96-85, and your two
special configure flags; and the bootstrap test still passed.  In fact
all tests pass or xfail.

I wouldn't expect SEC_EXCLUDE to be used much when building ld.  How
did you determine that it was my patch?

Can you be more specific about your system?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bfd is broken
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- bfd is broken
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]