This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] m68000 ELF + two m68k gas fixes
- From: "Aaron J. Grier" <aaron at frye dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:59:34 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68000 ELF + two m68k gas fixes
- References: <200112181754.MAA27626@swan.lcs.mit.edu> <20020201083449.D13753@dr-evil>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> -m68881 | -m68882 | -mno-68881 | -mno-68882\n\
> target has/lacks floating-point coprocessor\n\
> ! [default yes for 68020, 68030, and cpu32]\n"));
for what it's worth, I've always found this wording pretty ambiguous.
"has/lacks" and "yes" don't seem to match up. perhaps
[default lacks for 68020, 68030, and cpu32] would be more clear?
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | aaron@frye.com
"In a few thousand years people will be scratching their heads
wondering how on earth the first computer was invented and
bootstrapped without a prior computer to do it with."
-- Chris Malcolm, on comp.arch