This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers

From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, cgen at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:10:26 -0500
Subject: Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
References: <20020131162132.I19966@redhat.com> <3C59BD4A.9060900@cygnus.com> <20020131184230.A6166@redhat.com> <3C59DB61.3000106@cygnus.com> <20020131195734.D6166@redhat.com> <3C5A3694.7020502@cygnus.com> <20020201092827.H6166@redhat.com> <3C5AE910.4090009@cygnus.com> <20020201145627.A4226@redhat.com> <3C5AF43E.8030407@cygnus.com>

Hi -

cagney wrote:

> > We did whatever must have seemed most useful at the time for their
> > treatment ... one bfd_arch, a bunch of bfd_mach's.  Note that all
> > those coprocessors have a static set of instructions.
> 
> I'll take that as a royal we.  I don't know what you did for the PS2 and 
> will probably regret finding out.

It wasn't that bad.

> However, please expand.

In the context of discussing that port on a public mailing list,
and its iffy relevance to the current thread, I don't see why I
should do go into any more detail.  You know where to find the
sources.

- FChE

Attachment: msg00035/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]