This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: 2.12 branch: Sparc visibility failures
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:02:55AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:56:20PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Is that really working around what the test is supposed to be testing,
> > or is my interpretation correct? Jakub?
>
> Your interpretation is correct AFAICS. Definitely the compiler
> is entitled to make the transformation it does. I can't see how
> the result could be changed if the test uses the weak attribute
> instead of the asm.
Which leads to the question: what to do? I can't add __attribute__,
because that's a GCC-ism and I won't be surprised if Sun's compiler
does something similar. XFAIL for sparc-linux?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer