This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: (FWD) [PATCH] bump bfd version post 2.12 branching

From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 02:19:43 -0800
Subject: Re: (FWD) [PATCH] bump bfd version post 2.12 branching
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
References: <20020218004120.A2470@dragon.nuxi.com> <m37kpbyv4h.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: obrien at FreeBSD dot org

On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:52:46AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> > May I PLEASE commit this so I can tell a mainline built `ld' from a 2.12
> > branch one?
> 
> > -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(bfd, 2.11.93)
> > +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(bfd, 2.12.90)
> 
> Hmm, what is the third number for ?  The year ?  A minor revision
> number ? 

ENOCLUE.  I was just following what was done for mainline after the 2.11
branch was done.  And what I thought was done in GCC'ville.

> I suspect that this ought to be:
>
>     AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(bfd, 2.12.94)

.90, .94 ?  Up to you. :-)  They are the same for what I want to
accomplish.

>     AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(bfd, 2.12.02)
> or
>     AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(bfd, 2.12.0)

These would conflict with real 2.12 branch releases wouldn't they?

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

References:
- (FWD) [PATCH] bump bfd version post 2.12 branching
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: (FWD) [PATCH] bump bfd version post 2.12 branching
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]