This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [cjwatson@debian.org: Bug-Squashing Party #7 report]
- From: Phil Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at debian dot org>
- Cc: binutils at packages dot debian dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 20 Feb 2002 10:31:11 +0000
- Subject: Re: [cjwatson@debian.org: Bug-Squashing Party #7 report]
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202191931070.18638-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com>
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 00:32, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As I am trying to push binutils 2.12 (prerelease, at least) out within
> > the next two weeks, I'd appreciate details... Does it at least show up
> > in the ld testsuite?
>
> Not from what I gather. My ARM isn't running yet, so Philip will have to
> provide more info on that front.
I haven't actually checked yet but I'd be surprised if it shows up in
the testsuite.
Here's a testcase in C. Compile it with "gcc -fPIC". The number it
prints should be a valid address - the exact value isn't very exciting,
so long as it isn't zero.
[ For those just tuning in, more details of this bug are at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=134241&repeatmerged=yes
]
p.
--
foo();
main()
{
printf("%08x\n", foo);
exit(foo == 0);
}
foo()
{
}