This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:49:31PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:14:56AM +0100, Teemu Torma wrote: > > > But like I mentioned earlier, I fear it is an assembler bug, since the > > problem can be seen _before_ linking in the object file, and only in one > > object file out of many of them, and the rest of the system does work, > > at least when linked with binutils as shipped by Mandrake. I did not try > > the linking with the latest binutils, just the assembler part, and the > > resulting object file showed the same problem. > > > > I am just trying to make sure this is not a bug in binutils, that might > > bite in another time in another place. > > > > > I am enclosing a simple testcase for gcc 2.96. I got gcc -mcpu=i686 -o x foo.o bar.o ./x foo hello make: *** [all] Segmentation fault H.J. ---
Attachment:
bug.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |