This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Handle R_ALPHA_NONE

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:19:02PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> |> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:48:35PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> |> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:45:53PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> |> > > The issue is ELF/alpha allocates more relocation entries for ld.so than
> |> > > needed.
> |> > 
> |> > But why?  It is already trying to compute exactly how many
> |> > are needed.
> |> 
> |> If I have to guess, ELF/alpha doesn't handle the visibility right. The
> |> current glibc has
> 
> FWIW, ia64 has the same problem.
> 

I am not sure it is a visibility issue. It seems that ld.so generated
from the output of "ld -r" contains R_ALPHA_NONE.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]