This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h ?
- From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,aoliva at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com,bje at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:56:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h ?
- Organization: SuperH UK Ltd.
- References: <3CCED903.294513BE@st.com> <15568.36275.110744.510692@localhost.redhat.com> <3CD12BF8.7E1650C1@st.com> <or4rhotrng.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <3CD7EB51.7816DD1@st.com> <3CD803BC.5060900@cygnus.com> <3CD823D1.FC1E3717@st.com> <3CD85192.7020100@cygnus.com> <3CDAEDA4.3DE4A2D5@st.com> <15578.63785.429521.553723@localhost.redhat.com> <3CDB0B49.3040700@cygnus.com>
ezannoni@redhat.com:
> > I think include/gcc-sh64.h or include/gdb-sh64.h could be OK. Would match the
> > include/sim-sh64.h file.
Since we are going to have a file that describes both the SH1-4 and SH64 stuff,
I think it makes more sense to just say gdb-sh.h
ac131313@cygnus.com wrote:
> BTW, GDB has started moving the include/sim-*.h files into
> include/gdb/sim-*.h, but otherwise, yes.
Ok, gdb/gdb-sh.h then.
--
--------------------------
SuperH
2430 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4AQ
T:+44 1454 462330