This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd.h installation location

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Brendan Conoboy <blc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 09:50:23 -0700
Subject: Re: bfd.h installation location
References: <20020511001538.GA10398@redhat.com> <20020511075900.GP3698@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:29:00PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:15:38PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > Today I noticed that bfd.h gets installed under $prefix/include instead
> 
> I question whether we should be installing any of these files by
> default.  Which projects using libbfd don't provide their own
> copy of bfd?
> 

There are quite a few. I think, oprofile, modutils and ksymoops are
among them. I rememeber that because I had to add

-Wl,-Bstatic -lbfd, -Wl,-Bdynamic


H.J.


H.J.

References:
- bfd.h installation location
  - From: Brendan Conoboy
- Re: bfd.h installation location
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]