This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bfd.h installation location


On May 11, 2002, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:

> People who override bfd.h must have some something wrong.

You appear to be simply using different prefixes for each pair
(host,target).

The GNU Coding Standards say that files in $(prefix) should be common
for all hosts (and presumably to all targets), whereas files in
$(exec_prefix) may differ from one host to another.

Since bfd.h may differ from one host to another, it must not be
installed in $(prefix), but rather in $(exec_prefix).

You're free to keep exec_prefix = prefix, as long as you use different
prefixes for different hosts, but this should not be required, since
it's in direct conflict with the GNU Coding Standards.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]