This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Revised patch] Rework MIPS command-line handling

cgd@broadcom.com writes:
> At 23 Jul 2002 18:24:21 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > But to turn your own question back on you, does it?  Adding -mabi=eabi
> > at this stage might give the wrong impression.
> 
> Yes.  In fact, doing anything other than causing an error might give
> the wrong impressions.
> 
> That was my original point: specifying -mabi=meabi with gas
> approximately equivalent in effect to, say, -march=foo with the MIPS
> assembler.  That support is non-functional, and should cause an error.

OK, maybe I missed your point then ;).  Sounds like you're saying we
should drop MEABI support for gcc when TARGET_GAS.  Is that right?
If so, what do you think we should do with the mipsisa*-elf configs?

Richard
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]