This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd/config.bfd use of ifdef BFD64 for sh target

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: "Clarke, Stephen" <stephen dot clarke at superh dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:00:02 -0700
Subject: Re: bfd/config.bfd use of ifdef BFD64 for sh target
References: <287E4644B5249D449C56FA5409A874AE03EF55@sh-us-ex01.us.w2k.superh.com>

On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 06:47:47PM -0700, Clarke, Stephen wrote:
> 
> I've been puzzling over the following lines in bfd/config.bfd for a
> while:
> 
>   sh-*-elf* | sh[1234]*-elf* | sh-*-rtemself*)
>     targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_sh_vec
>     targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shl_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec shcoff_small_vec shlcoff_small_vec"
> #ifdef BFD64
>     targ_selvecs="${targ_selvecs} bfd_elf32_sh64_vec bfd_elf32_sh64l_vec bfd_elf64_sh64_vec bfd_elf64_sh64l_vec"
> #endif
>     targ_underscore=yes
>     ;;
> 
> I'm trying to understand the purpose of the #ifdef here.

I think you can safely remove them. See i[3456]86-*-linux-gnu*.



H.J.

References:
- bfd/config.bfd use of ifdef BFD64 for sh target
  - From: Clarke, Stephen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]