Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:41:13PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> HJ,
>    Okay. So this patch will allow glibc-2-2-branch glibc with
> your proposed glibc-2-2-ppc patch to build a usable gcc 3.2, right?

Yes.

> I haven't started my rebuild of stock gcc 3.2 against this
> new glibc build yet. Should I test your binutils patch...that is 
> build a new binutils before I rebuild the stock gcc 3.2 against

You need the new binutils with my patch for gcc 3.2.

> your proposed glibc changes? I would like to do that but I am
> a little fuzzy on what I should check. Just if the resulting gcc 3.2
> can pass it make check testsuite properly to make sure no 
> breakage has occurred?

Yes.

Here is the testcase patch. I will check in both of my patches today
if I don't hear any objections before 9pm PDT.


H.J.

Attachment: ld-version-dso.patch
Description: Text document