Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects

[Jack Howarth <howarth at fuse dot net>]

HJ,
   How important is it to rebuild glibc with this newest binutils?
Will its symbol versioning/exporting be effected by this newest
binutils patch? As I read things it seems not be to necessary.
Only...

1) rebuild glibc-2-2-branch with glibc-2-2-pcc patch using
current binutils-cvs
2) rebuild binutils-cvs with this newest binutils patch
3) rebuild gcc-3.2 with the patched binutils

Am I reading things correctly? I ask because I want to be able
to tell Debian what specific order these mods must be built in.
                                 Jack

On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 14:06, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:59:01PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 13. August 2002 19:28, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > This patch should fix the problem. I will submit a testcase patch
> > > also.
> > 
> > I'll update binutils on entropy with your patch and will rebuild gcc/glibc 
> > with it. Then I'll submit my patches for glibc-2-2-branch and mainline to 
> > Uli.
> > 
> > HJ, a plea, is it possible for you to do a new release of your binutils with 
> > this patch immediately, so I could update the platform notes for the gcc-3.2 
> > release accordingly?
> > 
> 
> I will try. But I'd like to do some more testing first. It may take a
> few days.
> 
> 
> H.J.