This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, earl_chew at agilent dot com
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:57:29 +0930
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
References: <3D929521.60708@agilent.com> <20021001173650.O25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <m365wmyxt2.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <3D99DCA2.56CB5F35@agilent.com> <m3wup2xb8g.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <3D9A832F.8060903@agilent.com> <m37kh1w9zp.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:55:22AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I still don't think -r should imply --traditional-format.

Fair enough.  I missed seeing that link_info.traditional_format
sets BFD_TRADITIONAL_FORMAT on the output bfd, so didn't consider
what that particular flag does.

Earl, you need to do some testing.  With current cvs binutils.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Earl Chew
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Earl Chew
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Enabling ld -r ELF .stab/.stabstr optimization
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]