This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: New "make check" failure on Linux/x86
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
- Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:50:36 -0700
- Subject: Re: New "make check" failure on Linux/x86
- References: <20021006104102.A31374@lucon.org>
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:41:02AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I got
>
> /export/build/linux/binutils-debug/build-i686-linux/ld/../gas/as-new -o
> tmpdir/dump0.o /export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-linkonce/x.s
> /export/build/linux/binutils-debug/build-i686-linux/ld/../gas/as-new -o
> tmpdir/dump1.o /export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-linkonce/y.s
> ./ld-new -L/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-linkonce
> -Ttext 0xa00 -T $srcdir/$subdir/zeroeh.ld -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o
> tmpdir/dump1.o
> failed with: <tmpdir/dump1.o(.eh_frame+0x10): warning: relocation against
> removed section>, expected: <>
> tmpdir/dump1.o(.eh_frame+0x10): warning: relocation against removed section
> FAIL: ld-linkonce/zeroehl32
>
Alan, it is due to
#if BFD_VERSION_DATE > 20021005
(*finfo->info->callbacks->warning)
(finfo->info,
_("warning: relocation against removed
section"),
NULL, input_bfd, o, rel->r_offset);
#endif
in elflink.h. Could you please look into it?
Thanks.
H.J.