This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: hjl at lucon dot org
Cc: rsandifo at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, linux-mips at linux-mips dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
References: <20021014091649.A29353@lucon.org><wvnfzv9ou6j.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><20021014101640.A30133@lucon.org>

   From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
   Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:16:40 -0700

   The problem here is when gcc fills the delay slot with nop, it kills
   branch relaxation. My request is gcc never fills the delay slot with
   nop. If gcc can't find any insn to fill, don't emit .set noreorder.

Why not work on making gcc fill the delay slot with something
suitable if you think the branch relaxer can do better for
your testcase?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]